Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
About Me
Good Library Blogs
- Academic Librarian
- ACRLog
- Annoyed Librarian
- Confessions of a Science Librarian
- Disruptive Library Technology Jester
- Distant Librarian
- Free Government Information
- Free Range Librarian
- Librarian.net
- LibrarianInBlack
- Library 2.0: An Academic's Perspective
- Library Garden
- Library Marketing - Thinking Outside the Book
- Library of Congress Blog
- Library Stream
- Library Web Chic
- LISNews
- Organizing Stuff
- ReadWriteWeb
- Shifted Librarian
- Tame the Web
- Uncommon Commons
- Walt at Random
2 comments:
Dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. That means a few things. First, the court it was later transferred to (Fairfax, Va.) decided that the case didn't belong there. Also, the Fairfax court made no decision at all on the merits, meaning that the court didn't decide whether Thomson had a good case. Therefore, Thomson is free to try to file again in another court to have the issues decided.
Of course, at this point Thomson may figure that it's already spent too much, and quit. Or maybe not.
-Michele G.
I had lunch with a Thomson rep at ALA...I should've asked him about this. (He likely would've been completely poleaxed, actually.)
Post a Comment